Wal-Mart or not, there's a compelling dollars-and-sense case for package optimization.
Long known for industry-changing supply chain initiatives, Wal-Mart is effecting equal change in the packaging sector.
It
was during the fall 2006 Clinton Global Initiative conference that
Wal-Mart President Lee Scott announced his company's sustainability
initiative. Since then, many areas of U.S. business have ramped up the
focus on environmental stewardship.
The University of Nevada at
Reno's Center for Logistics Management reports that 21 of the nation's
Fortune 100 companies have since published "sustainability" reports.
Forty-four of those companies have social responsibility reports and 63
of them devote Web pages to sustainability or the environment.
For
its part, Wal-Mart also maintains a sustainability section on its Web
site. Meanwhile - recognizing that environmental stewardship is
impacted by daily personal decisions - the Bentonville, Ark.-based
retailer also has created a personal sustainability plan for each of
its employees. Elsewhere, Wal-Mart has created posts for a "senior vice
president of sustainability" and a "vice president of packaging and
product innovation," the latter position within its Sam's Club
division.
Wal-Mart vendors, meanwhile, are learning to use the
retailer's sustainable packaging scorecard. This measurement tool
provides specific metrics for suppliers to evaluate themselves relative
to other vendors. These metrics evolved from a list of favorable
attributes known as the "7 R's of Packaging," which are: remove,
reduce, reuse, recycle, renew, revenue and read.
After months
of consultations, the CPG industry's Packaging Sustainable Value
Network - a group of 200 global industry leaders - outlined the
following metrics for Wal-Mart's packaging scorecard. When considering
a favorable score:
- 15 percent will be based on GHG / CO2 per ton of production;
- 15 percent will be based on material value;
- 15 percent will be based on product / package ratio;
- 15 percent will be based on cube utilization;
- 10 percent will be based on transportation;
- 10 percent will be based on recycled content;
- 10 percent will be based on recovery value;
- 5 percent will be based on renewable energy;
- 5 percent will be based on innovation.
Not
surprisingly, Wal-Mart brought its private label suppliers into its
packaging program in November 2006. The retailer's 60,000 suppliers
subsequently joined the plan in February 2007. Wal-Mart then launched
its packaging scorecard evaluation program this past February.
To
date, the program appears to have good momentum with more than 6,000
suppliers and an estimated 97,000 products involved. By 2013, Wal-Mart
projects $10 billion in total cost reductions with $3.5 billion of that
amount channeled to Bentonville while suppliers share the remaining
$6.5 billion. Driving those savings is a comprehensive 5 percent
reduction in packaging, company officials say.
Because my
consulting firm specializes in packaging optimization, I am often asked
whether the 5 percent packaging reduction goal realistically is
achievable. My unequivocal response is "absolutely."
This is
based on our experience with more than 400 packaging optimization
projects - in which our clients averaged a 10 percent packaging
reduction. That said I expect Wal-Mart and its suppliers easily will
surpass the 5 percent target.
Here's another case in point.
Last fall saw retail food and beverage processors in the United Kingdom
pledge to trim 340,000 tons of packaging by 2010 - a figure
significantly lower than 4.6 million tonnes used in 2005. This
represents a 13 percent reduction, which is more than double the
Wal-Mart objective.
Interestingly, the U.K. processors also
pledged that no food and packaging waste would go to landfill after
2015. Furthermore - using 2005 figures as a comparison - this group
also has targeted 2010 for an absolute reduction in the level of
packaging reaching households.
Ten years ago, one of my firm's
founders told me that - while there should be strong environmental
impact from packaging optimization - there wasn't much corporate
commitment. Candidly, I now am amazed by how quickly the situation has
changed. Almost every company we speak to has a big interest in
sustainability and I have no expectation about the pressure slackening
any time soon.
One large food processor - a significant player
in refrigerated and frozen foods - already has an active packaging
optimization strategy. When I asked about its deliverable savings, the
answer was $100 million in cost reduction.
Let me point out two other areas of note.
First,
processors are much more open to considering a change in packaging if
it delivers worthwhile cost reduction. In the past, executives seemed
much less inclined to package count changes inside shipping cases and
they gave very little thought to retail package revisions. Now, almost
everything is open to evaluation.
Secondly, active food
distributors - including those in retail and in foodservice - are
taking a much more participative role and influencing how their private
label suppliers are packaging product. Similar to Wal-Mart, these
distributors have learned that if the supplier isn't efficient in all
aspects of the supply chain, both the processor and retailer suffer
high costs.
Although it's not a food company, one of our
clients - Crate & Barrel - recently won a green award as a direct
result of packaging optimization. In Crate & Barrel's case, there
were many ancillary benefits to this project. However, the main driver
was that by re-engineering its shipped cases, the company could reduce
corrugate usage by more than 10 million square feet per year. The
environmental benefit of eliminating this quantity of material from the
waste stream cannot be overemphasized.
Side bar: DuPont honors sustainable packaging achievements
The DuPont Co. recognizes consumer packaged goods companies for
excellence in packaging every year, but this year - the 20th
anniversary of the DuPont Awards for packaging innovation - the
Wilmington, Del.-based company says it added a twist.
"Sustainable
packaging is a growing and important focus area for DuPont," said Diane
Gulyas, group vice president - DuPont Performance Materials in a press
release about the awards. And DuPont is far from alone in its concern.
The company says approximately 65 percent of consumer packaged goods
companies say they will change their packaging in the next year to make
it more environmentally friendly.
This year DuPont gathered a
group of jurors with substantial industry experience to honor
achievements in the sustainable packaging arena. Seven winners and
three honorable mentions were chosen from more than 80 international
entrants. Factors considered were responsible sourcing, effective
recovery and energy optimization.
DuPont recognized Harrislee,
Germany-based Larsen Danish Seafood who it says designed a
single-portion retort container that cuts down on the waste produced
from discarding larger portions and also is made using raw materials.
DuPont adds that the container is recyclable and uses less energy and
resources during production than traditional retortable containers.
For more information on the other 20th DuPont Awards for Packaging Innovation winners, visit
www.packaging.dupont.com.
Side bar: Kraft outlines packaging goals
Kraft Foods Inc. is committed to making its food packaging more
sustainable and has identified three principal means of doing so. That
was the message from Hendrik Eyselee, the company's director of
packaging and process technologies.
Speaking at the Food
Processing Suppliers Association annual conference this March, Eyselee
said Kraft, Northfield, Ill., uses a packaging "eco-calculator" to
provide a quantifiable perspective on:
- package weight;
- recycle ability / recycled content;
- package to product ratio;
- renewable materials;
- resulting landfill waste;
- energy required to produce package.
"We will achieve packaging reduction primarily with light-weighting technologies," he said.
Kraft's
three principal approaches will be to: reduce layers, make package
design more efficient and optimize materials. Eyselee noted that from
2001 to 2006, Kraft reduced energy consumption by 22.8 percent, water
consumption by 32.4 percent and waste generation by 14 percent.