This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Refrigerated Frozen Foods logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Refrigerated Frozen Foods logo
  • Home
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Digital Edition
    • Archives
  • Exclusives
    • Refrigerated Foods Processor of the Year
    • Frozen Foods Processor of the Year
    • Foodservice Distributor of the Year
    • Sustainable Processor of the year
    • State of the Industry
    • Top 150 Frozen Food Processors
    • Editor's Blog
    • Best New Retail Products
  • Topics
    • Case Studies
    • Energy Management
    • Food Safety
    • New Retail Products
    • Packaging
    • Supply Chain & Logistics
  • News
    • Industry News
    • Technology Showcase
    • People News
    • Supplier News
  • Directories & Guides
    • Cold Storage Warehouse Guide
    • Cold Storage Construction Guide
    • Take a Tour
    • Food Master
  • More
    • eNewsletter
    • Expert Columns
    • Trade Education
    • Partners
    • Polls
    • Directory of Associations
    • Market Research
    • Custom Content & Marketing Services
    • Nominations for RFF Awards
    • R&FF Store
    • Sneak Peeks
  • Events
    • Food Automation & Manufacturing (FA&M) Conference & Expo
    • Calendar of Events
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Photo Galleries
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Video Spotlights
    • White Paper eBlast
  • Contact Us
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • Subscribe
Home » What do the new FSMA preventive controls rules actually mean?
Food SafetyExpert Columns

What do the new FSMA preventive controls rules actually mean?

November 10, 2015
Brandon Neuschafer
KEYWORDS FSMA / FSMA readiness / USDA / USDA inspection / USDA standards
Reprints
No Comments

Key components of the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) are the obligations placed upon owners and operators of human and animal food facilities to conduct hazard analyses and implement preventive controls that address the identified hazards. These obligations, along with other FSMA requirements, are designed to shift the focus of U.S. food safety away from incident response and toward prevention.  After years of discussion, public comment and even litigation, FDA finalized rules on hazard analysis and preventive controls for human and animal food on Sept. 10. 

The Preventive Controls Rules, as they are generally known, apply to “covered facilities”—those facilities that manufacture, process, pack or hold food. In other words, if the facility is required to register with FDA, the preventive controls rules apply. Excluded, however, are farms, which are defined as operations devoted to growing and harvesting crops, raising animals or any combination. Certain operations conducted on farms, such as packing and storing operations, will not eliminate the exemption, although exempt farming operations may be covered by the Product Safety Rule.

So, what will be required of covered facilities as a result of these final rules? If you’ve been following the path the Preventive Controls Rules have taken through the rulemaking process, you won’t notice too much that is new. The basic obligation is the requirement to develop and maintain a written food safety plan, which includes conducting a hazard analysis, instituting preventive controls, monitoring the implementation and effectiveness of the preventive controls and preparing a recall plan. The rules also make some changes to current good manufacturing processes and impose requirements relating to the development of a supply chain program.

The hazard analysis is conducted to identify “known or reasonably foreseeable biological, chemical and physical hazards,” whether these hazards are introduced into the process naturally, intentionally or unintentionally. Sources of potential hazards include experience with the process and ingredients, as well as “illness data, scientific reports and other information,” and must take into account potential hazards associated with the ingredients, the facility and equipment used, sanitation and hygiene, manufacturing procedures, packaging, labeling, storage, transportation, the intended or reasonably foreseeable use of the product and any other relevant factors. The analysis also includes a consideration of the severity of the potential hazard and the probability of it occurring. 

The facility must prepare and implement a written preventive controls plan that is tailored to minimize or prevent the hazards identified. Key components of the plan include process controls, food allergen controls, sanitation controls, supply chain controls and a recall plan. This obligation is broader than just addressing critical control points; rather it extends to controls other than at critical control points that are “appropriate for food safety.” Of particular note are the supply chain controls, which require the implementation of a risk-based supply chain program for ingredients deemed a hazard from a receiving facility. In some instances, receiving facilities will be required to review and qualify suppliers, and except for under limited circumstances, will be prohibited from accepting product from non-qualified suppliers.

Next, a facility must prepare written procedures designed to verify and document that the preventive controls are working. This includes monitoring of preventive controls, correction (of an individual incident) and corrective action (of a larger problem with the preventive controls) and verification of consistent and effective implementation of preventive controls. Re-analysis of preventive controls is required every three years, or perhaps sooner if certain triggering events occur, which include significant process changes, receipt of new information about a potential hazard, a significant increase in a known hazard or where a preventive control is determined to be ineffective. 

The Preventive Controls Rules also make changes to current good manufacturing processes (CGMPs). It has been almost 30 years since the CGMPs for human food were last modified, and FDA took the current opportunity to transform previously non-binding provisions, like those related to education, training and employee qualification, into binding obligations. With respect to animal food, the rules create first-time CGMPs.

Implementation dates are staggered based on the size of the company involved. For human food, very small businesses (those averaging less than $1 million in annual sales of human food plus the amount of food held for a fee) will have three years to comply, although they must submit records showing that they qualify as a very small business by Jan. 1, 2016. Small businesses, those with less than 500 full-time employees, will have two years to comply. All other businesses have one year to comply. The timelines for animal food are roughly the same for CGMP compliance, but an additional year is added to each category for preventive control compliance. Note also for animal food that the very small business threshold is $2.5 million, not $1 million.

The overall impact on the rules will in large part depend on how proactive a particular business was prior to the rules being finalized. FDA expects that many large facilities are already doing a vast majority of what is now being required. Those facilities may still need to develop additional documentation or tweak procedures. Medium- to smaller-sized facilities likely have more work to do, but they also have more time to get it done. 

Interesting and complicated issues swirl around companies who are not themselves food facilities, but are technology and equipment providers to such facilities. A thorough hazard analysis will require an analysis of the systems and equipment used in manufacturing, storing and distributing food, and that likely means the quality and reliability of such systems and equipment. In worst-case scenarios, questions are raised surrounding liability in the event of the failure of products provided by third parties, which is a question that existing contracts (to the extent there are any) may not address. It’s certainly not too late for companies on all sides of the table to begin thinking about not only how the Preventive Controls Rules impact their businesses, but also whether the rules impact their approach to allocation of liability in their agreements.

Subscribe to Refrigerated and Frozen Foods

Brandon Neuschafer is a partner at law firm Bryan Cave LLP, St. Louis.

Related Articles

What companies can do to prepare for the Preventive Controls for Human Food rule

Why FSMA collaboration is the new normal in food transportation

What the best fleets do to move the industry forward

Implementing FSMA compliance through pest prevention

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Subscribe For Free!
  • Print & Digital Edition Subscriptions
  • What’s Hot in Cold eNewsletter
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Popular Stories

2019 Frozen Foods Processor of the Year

2019 Frozen Foods Processor of the Year: B&G Foods—The giant of the frozen vegetables aisle

ARYZTA Mixed Rolls

ARYZTA announces new frozen bread line at Ancaster, Canada, bakery

Gotham Greens Chicago greenhouse

Gotham Greens opens largest urban agriculture campus

Jeff Thomas, TransPlace

Transportation trends and 2020 market outlook

Zucchini

2019 Frozen Foods Processor of the Year: B&G Foods makes giant-sized footprint in frozen food category

ColdStorageConstructionGuide_360

Events

April 26, 2020

Food Automation and Manufacturing Conference and Expo

Food Engineering's Food Automation & Manufacturing Conference and Expo (FA&M) is a 2 ½ day event that brings food and beverage processors and suppliers together to gain valuable information on the latest trends and technologies in manufacturing, automation, sustainability and food safety.

January 1, 2030

Webinar Sponsorship Information

For webinar sponsorship information, visit www.bnpevents.com/webinars or email webinars@bnpmedia.com.

View All Submit An Event

Poll

How will your company be affected?

President Trump withdrew the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership deal. How will this decision affect the future of your company?
View Results Poll Archive

WarehouseGuide_360

Refrigerated & Frozen Foods Magazine

Refrigerated & Frozen Food November 2019

2019 November

Check out the November 2019 edition of Refrigerated & Frozen Foods: 2019 Frozen Foods Processor of the Year, trucking trends, renewable energy initiatives, and much more!
View More Create Account
  • Resources
    • Food & Beverage Brands
    • Packaging
    • List Rental
    • Exclusives
    • Privacy Policy
    • Survey and Sample
  • Want More
    • Connect

Copyright ©2019. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing